|
|
Registros recuperados : 159 | |
82. | | RIVAS, M.; GARCÍA, M.; BELLENDA, B.; AYRES, C.; IRISITY, M.; SILVEIRA, A.; CALVETE, A.; ZOPPOLO, R.; CABRERA, D.; VIGNALE, B.; PUPPO, M.; ZÁCCARI, F.; MARTÍNEZ, N.; DELLACASA, E. Integrando saberes. Avances en investigación acción participativa sobre el Guayabo del país en La Quebrada de los Cuervos, Treinta y Tres. [resumen] Valorización del producto: experiencias novedosas en producción, procesamiento y comercialización. ln: Congreso Nacional de Horti-Fruticultura, 12. Jornadas Regionales de Manejo Poscosecha de Frutas. Seminario Suelos en Horticultura. Seminario Frutales de Pepita. 20-23 octubre 2012, Montevideo (UY) Trabajos presentados. Montevideo (UY): INIA; SUHF, 2010. p.136.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
84. | | ZOPPOLO, R.; CIAPPESONI, G. Introducción. Tecnologías con enfoque en la productividad y la calidad. Tercera sección. Tecnologías con enfoque en la productividad y la calidad. Editores: Roberto Zoppolo y Gabriel Ciappesoni. In: Georgina Paula García-Inza; José María Paruelo; Roberto Zoppolo. (eds). Aportes científicos y tecnológicos del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) del Uruguay a las trayectorias agroecológicas. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Fundación CICCUS, 2023. p.295-300. p.295-300.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
86. | | CONDE, P.; ARIAS-SIBILLOTTE; VILLAMIL, J.J.; BRUZZONE, J.; BERNASCHINA, Y.; FERRARI, V.; ZOPPOLO, R.; VILLAMIL, J.; LEONI, C. It is feasible to produce olive oil in temperate humid climate regions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 27 November 2019, Volume 10, Article number 1544. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01544 Article history: Received: 12 June 2019 / Accepted: 05 November 2019 / Published: 27 November.
This article is part of the research topic: Proceedings of Olivebioteq 2018 – Olive Management, Biotechnology and Authenticity of Olive...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
87. | | FAGHERAZZI, A.F.; KRESTZSCHMAR. A.A.; MACEDO, T.A.; VIGNOLO, G.K.; ANTUNES, L.E.C.; KIRSCHBAUM, D.S.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; ZOPPOLO, R.; JOFRE, F.; RUFATO, L. La coltivazione dei piccoli frutti in Sud America: non solo mirtilli. Economia e Tecnica. Rivista di Frutticoltura e Ortofloricoltura, 2017, v.44 (7-8): 44-47.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
92. | | DELEÓN, R.; VICENTE, G.; ZOPPOLO, R.; ARNAUD, A.; MIGUEZ, M. Lidar based, tree row volume estimation for phytosanitary products reduction in fruit trees orchards. [Conference paper]. Proceedings 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), October 2020, volume 2020, Article number 91812915. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS45731.2020.9181291 Article history:
Published in: 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS 2020, Virtual, Online, 10 October 2020 - 21 October 2020, 169903. Date of Conference, 12-14 Oct 2020. Conference Location: Seville, Spain.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
94. | | ZEBALLOS, R.; ZOPPOLO, R.; FASIOLO, C. Malla sanitaria AFRUPI. Segunda temporada 2018/2019. Proyecto FPTA 346 - Producción integrada y mecanización. In: INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria); Programa Nacional Producción Frutícola. Seminario de actualización técnica en frutales de pepita. INIA Las Brujas, 3-4 de octubre de 2019. Canelones (UY): INIA. p. 44-54. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 792).Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
98. | | SCATONI, I. B.; DUARTE, F.; MUJICA, V.; ZOPPOLO, R.; GABARD, Z. Manejo Regional de Plagas: desde la investigación a la producción. (Conferencia). Bloque 3: Manejo de insectos-plaga, malezas y enfermedades. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 4., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 2., 1° setiembre, 2017, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2017. p. 45-46.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
99. | | SCATONI, I.B.; DUARTE, F.; MUJICA, M.; ZOPPOLO, R.; GABARD, Z. Manejo regional de plagas en frutales de hoja caduca en la zona sur de Uruguay. In: JORNADA NACIONAL DE FITOPATOLOGÍA, 3; JORNADA NACIONAL DE PROTECCIÓN VEGETAL, 1., 3 SETIEMBRE 2015, MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY. Libro de Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay) : SUFIT, 2015. p. 47Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 159 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
12/02/2020 |
Actualizado : |
12/02/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
BERRUETA, C.; HEUVELINK, E.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; DOGLIOTTI, S. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; EP HEUVELINK, Horticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, the Netherlands; GUSTAVO GIMÉNEZ FRANQUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI MORO, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Estimation of tomato yield gaps for greenhouse in Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Scientia Horticulturae, 30 April 2020, Volume 265, 109250. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 28 September 2018 / Revised 20 January 2020 / Accepted 30 January 2020 / Available online 7 February 2020. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by earlier planting, reducing leaf pruning intensity after harvest beginning, and increasing greenhouse transmissivity by more frequent plastic cover renewal and removing roofs? shading screens and whitening.
© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.
Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Light interception; Solanum lycopersicum; TOMSIM; Yield components; Yield potentail. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 02610naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1060797 005 2020-02-12 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250$2DOI 100 1 $aBERRUETA, C. 245 $aEstimation of tomato yield gaps for greenhouse in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 500 $aArticle history: Received 28 September 2018 / Revised 20 January 2020 / Accepted 30 January 2020 / Available online 7 February 2020. 520 $aABSTRACT. Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by earlier planting, reducing leaf pruning intensity after harvest beginning, and increasing greenhouse transmissivity by more frequent plastic cover renewal and removing roofs? shading screens and whitening. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 653 $aLight interception 653 $aSolanum lycopersicum 653 $aTOMSIM 653 $aYield components 653 $aYield potentail 700 1 $aHEUVELINK, E. 700 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, G. 700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S. 773 $tScientia Horticulturae, 30 April 2020, Volume 265, 109250. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|